Anonymous asked: Your latest ask/reply reminded me of an argument I've encountered before and never known how to respond to. It's very minor in the grand scheme of things, but concerning equal pay in sports. People often bring up how women's tennis matches are much shorter than men's.. And so they end up being paid less. Is this an example of inequality or is it justified? Clearly, in usual work situations, woman work just as much and as long as men, but what about in unusual situations? Thanks~
My question is: whose decision was it for women’s matches to be shorter? And whose decision was it that a tennis player’s pay should be based on the length of the matches?
The answer isn’t necessarily just “men”—some women participate in this too—but I really doubt it’s “female tennis players who decided that they didn’t like money anyway and this was a totally fair deal for them.”







